Moving from Express.js to NestJS in Modern Node.js Development: Why It’s Time to Upgrade

/

Overview:-

  • Explore why developers are shifting from Express.js to NestJS for backend development.
  • Compare learning curves, code structure, scalability, real-world scenarios, and more features.
  • Discover how NestJS improves productivity, maintainability, and long-term project success.

Web development evolves at lightning speed, and the framework you choose shapes everything: architecture, scalability, and even developer satisfaction. 

For years, Express.js dominated Node backends, powering countless applications with its simplicity. But simplicity often turns messy at scale, leaving scattered routes and unstructured code that challenge long-term productivity. 

Now NestJS has been introduced – the modern era of structured, maintainable, and scalable backend development. It’s no longer just about writing code quickly; it’s about sustaining growth. 

That’s why more teams are moving beyond Express and Fastify toward NestJS. Let’s explore why organizations are embracing this shift, and why it may be the right move for you.

Express.js: Fast and Simple

Express.js, often referred to simply as Express, is a Node.js web application framework designed for building web applications and APIs. It is a free and open-source software and is widely considered the best standard server framework for Node.js.

Express.js is lightweight, flexible, and simple. It allows us to have full control over the request and response pipeline, which is just so suitable for rapid building of REST APIs on a smaller or medium-sized level.

But this minimalism also has its drawbacks:

  • Lack of a contract: Express has no contracts to prescribe architecture or design, leaving code bases inconsistent and hard to maintain.
  • Boilerplate Code: Every middleware chain and error handling falls into manual implementation by default, which needs to be copied and pasted from the existing code base to new implementations.
  • Limited Dependency Injection support: Dependency management is fully manual, and it becomes most difficult to test and maintain modularity.
  • Second Class TypeScript Citizenship: TypeScript can be used, but support is limited, making development harder and less smooth. Technically doable, but not a first-class citizen with native or optimized support.


NestJS: The Backend Framework Inspired by Angular

NestJS is a TypeScript-based progressive Node.js framework that draws a lot of inspiration from the design of Angular. To introduce modern features outside of the box, it wraps around Express (or Fastify) and provides a strong layer of abstraction. It also provides

  • Ā Injection of Dependency
  • Ā Type-safety development using TypeScript and modularity
  • Ā Support for WebSockets, Microservices, GraphQL, and REST
  • Ā Guards, filters, pipes, middleware, and interceptors
  • Ā Integrated CLI tools and support for testing
  • NestJS may appear more complex initially, but that complexity pays off:
  • Junior devs onboard faster
  • Features are easier to isolate and extend
  • You avoid tech debt by default
  • The CLI helps reduce boilerplate

Features of NestJS and Express.js

This is a small comparison of the features of Express.js and NestJS

Key Reasons to Move from Express to NestJS

Let’s take a look at some of the reasons to move from Express to NestJS

1. Scalability Made Easy

NestJS uses controllers, providers, and modules to support a modular architecture. This facilitates you to:

  • Divide your application into reasonable portions.
  • Use the same code for all features.
  • Rapidly onboard new developers.


2. In-built Dependency Injection(DI)

NestJS includes a robust Dependency Injection, unlike Express, where you need to manually manage your dependencies or make use of third-party tools. Better testability, loose coupling, and maintainable code are the outcomes of this.

3. First-Class TypeScript Support

TypeScript is used throughout the development of the NestJS application. On the other hand, Express uses only type definitions that are supplied by the community.  

Type safety enhances tooling (auto-complete, for example), helps find bugs early, and improves the developer experience.

4. Convention Over Configuration

NestJS avoids the need for boilerplate decisions by sticking to clear architectural patterns (inspired by Angular). Instead of inventing the wheel, you stick to established guidelines for:

  • Controllers
  • Services
  • Guards
  • DTOs and Validation

Codebases become consistent and more readable as a result.

5. Ready for Microservices

Microservices and event-driven architecture are becoming most common in modern systems. NestJS offers native support for:

  • Kafka
  • RabbitMQ
  • Redis Pub/Sub
  • gRPC
  • WebSockets

All use a consistent and declarative syntax.

6. Best Testing Strategy

With built-in DI (dependency injection) and mocking feature, NestJS allows us to use tools like Jest for writing unit and integration tests, making it test-friendly.

7. Cleaner Middleware and Lifecycle Management

  • Complex lifecycles and middleware logic can close the Express applications.Ā 
  • NestJS uses pipes, guards, and interceptors, which have distinct functionalities, to divide the concerns neatly.Ā 

NestJS doesn’t throw away Express, it builds on it:

  • Uses Express under the hood (can switch to Fastify)
  • All Express middleware remains compatible
  • Gradual migration path for existing applications

Express.js vs NestJS: A Short Comparison

Here’s a short overview of both Express.js and NestJS side-by-side

Code structure

Here’s a code block from Express and NestJS each.

Express:

NestJS:

NestJS code is cleaner, more structured, and easier to test.

Learning Curve: Is NestJS Hard to Learn?

NestJS may seem to be wordy or “too Angular-like structure” at first when you’re from Express. But after you master these:

  • Decorators
  • Providers
  • Modules
  • Dependency Injection

You’ll realise that NestJS increases maintainability and long-term productivity.

Also, the NestJS CLI (nest g module, nest g controller, and nest g service) uses scaffolding to advance development.

When should you migrate?

Consider these when migrating to NestJS :

  • Your Express codebase is getting larger and harder to manage.
  • You wish to use webSockets, GraphQL, or microservices.
  • You’re developing apps of an enterprise calibre.
  • You desire improved tooling and type safety.
  • You intend to assemble a sizable team for the project.

Because NestJS can work with existing Express middleware and routers, you don’t need to completely redo everything at once. Modules can be moved gradually.

Conclusion

The Node.js community benefited most from Express.js in its early years, but as JavaScript development advances, we require frameworks that support scalable, maintainable architecture. 

The next big thing is NestJS, which adds the structure required for enterprise applications while maintaining the flexibility we love about Node.js.

Learning NestJS benefits the teams by allowing them to create flexible, long-lasting applications in terms of maintainability, developer experience, and future adaptability. It’s time for our backend frameworks to change with the JavaScript ecosystem.

Overview:-

  • Explore why developers are shifting from Express.js to NestJS for backend development.
  • Compare learning curves, code structure, scalability, real-world scenarios, and more features.
  • Discover how NestJS improves productivity, maintainability, and long-term project success.

Web development evolves at lightning speed, and the framework you choose shapes everything: architecture, scalability, and even developer satisfaction. 

For years, Express.js dominated Node backends, powering countless applications with its simplicity. But simplicity often turns messy at scale, leaving scattered routes and unstructured code that challenge long-term productivity. 

Now NestJS has been introduced – the modern era of structured, maintainable, and scalable backend development. It’s no longer just about writing code quickly; it’s about sustaining growth. 

That’s why more teams are moving beyond Express and Fastify toward NestJS. Let’s explore why organizations are embracing this shift, and why it may be the right move for you.

Express.js: Fast and Simple

Express.js, often referred to simply as Express, is a Node.js web application framework designed for building web applications and APIs. It is a free and open-source software and is widely considered the best standard server framework for Node.js.

Express.js is lightweight, flexible, and simple. It allows us to have full control over the request and response pipeline, which is just so suitable for rapid building of REST APIs on a smaller or medium-sized level.

But this minimalism also has its drawbacks:

  • Lack of a contract: Express has no contracts to prescribe architecture or design, leaving code bases inconsistent and hard to maintain.
  • Boilerplate Code: Every middleware chain and error handling falls into manual implementation by default, which needs to be copied and pasted from the existing code base to new implementations.
  • Limited Dependency Injection support: Dependency management is fully manual, and it becomes most difficult to test and maintain modularity.
  • Second Class TypeScript Citizenship: TypeScript can be used, but support is limited, making development harder and less smooth. Technically doable, but not a first-class citizen with native or optimized support.


NestJS: The Backend Framework Inspired by Angular

NestJS is a TypeScript-based progressive Node.js framework that draws a lot of inspiration from the design of Angular. To introduce modern features outside of the box, it wraps around Express (or Fastify) and provides a strong layer of abstraction. It also provides

  • Ā Injection of Dependency
  • Ā Type-safety development using TypeScript and modularity
  • Ā Support for WebSockets, Microservices, GraphQL, and REST
  • Ā Guards, filters, pipes, middleware, and interceptors
  • Ā Integrated CLI tools and support for testing
  • NestJS may appear more complex initially, but that complexity pays off:
  • Junior devs onboard faster
  • Features are easier to isolate and extend
  • You avoid tech debt by default
  • The CLI helps reduce boilerplate

Features of NestJS and Express.js

This is a small comparison of the features of Express.js and NestJS

Key Reasons to Move from Express to NestJS

Let’s take a look at some of the reasons to move from Express to NestJS

1. Scalability Made Easy

NestJS uses controllers, providers, and modules to support a modular architecture. This facilitates you to:

  • Divide your application into reasonable portions.
  • Use the same code for all features.
  • Rapidly onboard new developers.


2. In-built Dependency Injection(DI)

NestJS includes a robust Dependency Injection, unlike Express, where you need to manually manage your dependencies or make use of third-party tools. Better testability, loose coupling, and maintainable code are the outcomes of this.

3. First-Class TypeScript Support

TypeScript is used throughout the development of the NestJS application. On the other hand, Express uses only type definitions that are supplied by the community.  

Type safety enhances tooling (auto-complete, for example), helps find bugs early, and improves the developer experience.

4. Convention Over Configuration

NestJS avoids the need for boilerplate decisions by sticking to clear architectural patterns (inspired by Angular). Instead of inventing the wheel, you stick to established guidelines for:

  • Controllers
  • Services
  • Guards
  • DTOs and Validation

Codebases become consistent and more readable as a result.

5. Ready for Microservices

Microservices and event-driven architecture are becoming most common in modern systems. NestJS offers native support for:

  • Kafka
  • RabbitMQ
  • Redis Pub/Sub
  • gRPC
  • WebSockets

All use a consistent and declarative syntax.

6. Best Testing Strategy

With built-in DI (dependency injection) and mocking feature, NestJS allows us to use tools like Jest for writing unit and integration tests, making it test-friendly.

7. Cleaner Middleware and Lifecycle Management

  • Complex lifecycles and middleware logic can close the Express applications.Ā 
  • NestJS uses pipes, guards, and interceptors, which have distinct functionalities, to divide the concerns neatly.Ā 

NestJS doesn’t throw away Express, it builds on it:

  • Uses Express under the hood (can switch to Fastify)
  • All Express middleware remains compatible
  • Gradual migration path for existing applications

Express.js vs NestJS: A Short Comparison

Here’s a short overview of both Express.js and NestJS side-by-side

Code structure

Here’s a code block from Express and NestJS each.

Express:

NestJS:

NestJS code is cleaner, more structured, and easier to test.

Learning Curve: Is NestJS Hard to Learn?

NestJS may seem to be wordy or “too Angular-like structure” at first when you’re from Express. But after you master these:

  • Decorators
  • Providers
  • Modules
  • Dependency Injection

You’ll realise that NestJS increases maintainability and long-term productivity.

Also, the NestJS CLI (nest g module, nest g controller, and nest g service) uses scaffolding to advance development.

When should you migrate?

Consider these when migrating to NestJS :

  • Your Express codebase is getting larger and harder to manage.
  • You wish to use webSockets, GraphQL, or microservices.
  • You’re developing apps of an enterprise calibre.
  • You desire improved tooling and type safety.
  • You intend to assemble a sizable team for the project.

Because NestJS can work with existing Express middleware and routers, you don’t need to completely redo everything at once. Modules can be moved gradually.

Conclusion

The Node.js community benefited most from Express.js in its early years, but as JavaScript development advances, we require frameworks that support scalable, maintainable architecture. 

The next big thing is NestJS, which adds the structure required for enterprise applications while maintaining the flexibility we love about Node.js.

Learning NestJS benefits the teams by allowing them to create flexible, long-lasting applications in terms of maintainability, developer experience, and future adaptability. It’s time for our backend frameworks to change with the JavaScript ecosystem.

logo

Soft Suave - Live Chat online

close

Are you sure you want to end the session?

šŸ’¬ Hi there! Need help?
chat 1